Bug#425451: I did reply to your ping!
Thank you for your very kind reply. So, maybe you would like to forward the bug 425882 to the latest version of the package?
On 24/07/07, Brice Goglin <
Brice.Goglin@ens-lyon.org> wrote:David wrote:
> I did reply to your ping.
I closed the bug because I didn't see any reply in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=425451
Maybe your replied to me without keeping the bug in CC and I missed your
mail, sorry if this is the case.
> But it seems that this bug is n-plicated. The last stage of things is
> here:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=425882
> <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=425882
>
>
> so the bug is not solved yet.
Ok fine, as long as we still have this one open, we don't care about the
other being closed.
> Maybe you are not paying too much attention here because 425882 is
> against the obsolete xserver-xorg-video-i810
The version number of the package matters more here actually. You
reported against version 2:2.0.0-1, that's the same than
xserver-xorg-video-intel from our point of view, so it's far from obsolete.
> 1) Forward this bug 425882 against xserver-xorg-video-intel
> 2) Archive the rest of the bugs like this (as the latest information
> is in 425882 and other bugs can mislead).
> 3) Of course, try to fix it :-) I will help as much as I can.
Don't worry, this bug in my queue of important things to take care of
soon. But they are several dozens other X-related bugs in this list and
I don't have time to do all this immediately, but it will happen in the
"near" future :)
Note that we usually don't fix this kind of bugs ourself, we talk to the
actual developer (either by reporting a bug at bugzilla.freedesktop.org
or by irc/mail) and try some patches.
Brice
Reply to: