On Mon, Jun 4, 2007 at 09:45:56 +0200, Eirik Byrkjeflot Anonsen wrote: > I was sure I'd read somewhere on the xorg list that the xcb lock > assertions were invariably triggered by bugs in xlib. I guess I > should know better than to trust my memory for such things :) > > While opera does access xlib directly (I believe through plain xlib, > xft and xrender), I'd be very surprised if we do any explicit locking. > And indeed "grep -r '[Ll]ockDisplay'" turns up no relevant matches in > the opera source tree. So I'd think the most likely culprit would be > qt. > For what it's worth, using the current libx11-6 package from experimental and opera_9.21-20070510.6-shared-qt_en_i386.deb from www.opera.com, I'm unable to reproduce the crash. Could the assertion failure be related to the known java bug with xcb [0], rather than a problem in opera itself? I also get these messages when starting opera: ERROR: ld.so: object 'libjvm.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored. ERROR: ld.so: object 'libawt.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored. Cheers, Julien [0] http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6532373
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature