[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#388630: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-mga: xserver always starts in a wrong resolution)

Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 12:46:29 +0200
with message-id <463F0385.9020905@ens-lyon.org>
and subject line Bug#388630: xserver-xorg-video-mga: xserver always starts in a wrong resolution
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: xserver-xorg-video-mga
Version: 1:1.4.1.dfsg.1-3
Severity: important

Since upgrading to the new mga-package the resolution I used at 85Hz only runs ant 75Hz. 
It looks like the exact same problem described in this Ubuntu-bug-report
Even the workaround works.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18
Locale: LANG=en_IE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-15@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_IE@euro)

Versions of packages xserver-xorg-video-mga depends on:
ii  libc6                        2.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  xserver-xorg-core            2:1.1.1-6   X.Org X server -- core server

xserver-xorg-video-mga recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:1.4.4.dfsg.1-2

As reported earlier, this bug should be fixed with the MGA driver in
Etch (1:1.4.4.dfsg.1-2 or maybe even earlier). Closing. If the bug still
occurs for you, please let me know.


--- End Message ---

Reply to: