Am Samstag 05 Mai 2007 schrieb Brice Goglin: > Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > I can try again tough - but I would prefer a Debian binary package. > > Is EXA supposed to be faster? > > The new package with all upstream fixes has just been uploaded, it > should be in unstable for i386 tomorrow (it's in incoming.debian.org > right now). > > There are several fixes regarding EXA but I don't know whether it's bug > fixes or a performance fixes (see [1]). Why do you need EXA exactly? It > might be good for compositing (compiz, beryl, ...) but I am not sure it > could bring much improvement in other cases. Hello Brice! Actually I do not really *need* it. I just read somewhere that its the successor of XAA and supposed to be faster. As for Amarok and Kaffeine XAA is certainly fast enough and I did not see a clear difference as I switched to EXA from XAA due to the issue I reported here anyway, I do not demand that this issue will be fixed ;) But I can give it a spin anyway. Am a bit curious at last ;-) Regards, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
Attachment:
pgpgQ_oZVGrUZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature