Bug#419986: output of 'ps ax'
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 12:21 +0200, Olaf Till wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 09:53:35PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> > Olaf Till wrote:
>
> > > With xserver-xorg-core_1.2.99.905-2_i386.deb (ignoring dependencies
> > > except libc6) X behaved correctly without drm, but did not even come
> > > up with drm, there was no process X afterwards. Installing
> > > xserver-xorg-core-dbg_1.2.99.905-2_i386.deb worked.
> > >
> >
> > This is strange too. Installing the -dbg package should not change
> > anything regarding "does it start successfully or not?". It only
> > provides some debugging symbols for gdb.
>
> Sorry, a typo, and further misread to 'dbg', probably. I meant without
> or with the line 'dri' in the module-section of xorg.conf (not
> 'drm'). BTW there was an unsatisfied dependency of the experimental
> X-server of a newer libdrm2 (don't know it, but sounds as if it had
> something to do with direct rendering) than installed.
>
> > > I again attach the xorg.conf used for all this and the log of the
> > > experimental X-server with dri.
> > >
> >
> > The log is pretty small and doesn't show any problem. Is this the right one?
>
> I think the log stops after loading the module dri. Seemingly X was
> not able to log anything else after this. Compare to the attached
> respective log (also experimental server) after commenting out "dri"
> in the module-section of xorg.conf. As I said, there was no process X
> present after trying to start this experimental server with "dri".
It probably dies trying to call an unresolved function due to the
unsatisfied libdrm2 dependency. See the X server's stderr output.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://tungstengraphics.com
Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer
Reply to: