[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#377305: marked as done (Please update mesa snapshot)

Your message dated Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:42:18 +0200
with message-id <20070420144218.GA11683@patate.is-a-geek.org>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of mesa 6.5.1-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: mesa
Version: 6.5.0.cvs.20060524-1
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

Xorg 7.1 requires a newer Mesa snapshot than what's in experimental
right now; specifically, it requires things like arrayobj in the
mesa-swx11-source package.  It would be great if mesa were updated to a
newer snapshot.

I've attached a patch that is basically what I used for a personal build
against a snapshot on 20060707; note that newer CVS snapshots require a
newer version of libdrm, hence the versioned build-dep bump.

=== modified file 'changelog'
--- changelog	
+++ changelog	
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+mesa (6.5.0.cvs.20060707-1) experimental; urgency=low
+
+  * New pull from CVS.
+  * Bump the build-dep on libdrm-dev up to >>2.0.2; it will FTBFS with 2.0.1.
+
+ -- Andres Salomon <dilinger@debian.org>  Fri, 07 Jul 2006 22:28:01 +0000
+
 mesa (6.5.0.cvs.20060524-1) experimental; urgency=low
 
   * The "-O666 -fwater-c00ling -DBE_F4ST" release

=== modified file 'control'
--- control	
+++ control	
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 Maintainer: Mesa package maintainers <pkg-mesa-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
 Uploaders: Marcelo E. Magallon <mmagallo@debian.org>
 Standards-Version: 3.7.2
-Build-Depends: lesstif2-dev, grep-dctrl, debhelper (>> 4), build-essential (>= 11), libdrm-dev (>> 2) [!hurd-i386], libdirectfb-dev, xutils, libexpat-dev, libxxf86vm-dev, libx11-dev, libxext-dev, pkg-config, x11proto-gl-dev
+Build-Depends: lesstif2-dev, grep-dctrl, debhelper (>> 4), build-essential (>= 11), libdrm-dev (>> 2.0.2) [!hurd-i386], libdirectfb-dev, xutils, libexpat-dev, libxxf86vm-dev, libx11-dev, libxext-dev, pkg-config, x11proto-gl-dev
 
 Package: libgl1-mesa-swx11
 Section: libs

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 6.5.1-0.1

Hi,

these bugs were fixed in a NMU a while ago, I'm now properly marking
them as closed.  The changelog entry from the relevant upload is
included below.

Cheers,
Julien

On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 19:47:28 -0700, David Nusinow wrote:

>  mesa (6.5.1-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
>  .
>    * New upstream version
>    * Build-dep on x11proto-gl-dev >= 1.4.8
>    * Stuff not in the upstream tarballs
>      + os2 glut stuff
>      + docs/gears.png
>    * Bump libdrm-dev build-dep to >= 2.0.2
>    * Add libdrm cflags to the debian-dri config. This allows the build system
>      to find drm.h
>    * Make sure that libGl looks for the dri drivers in the proper location. Do
>      this by setting the appropriate variables in the debian config
>    * Re-add s390 and m68k to the USE_IEEE test in src/mesa/main/imports.h. This
>      package seriously needs to store patches somewhere that are easy to find
>      and re-apply.
>    * Add patch from Cyril Brulebois to allow package to build on HURD, which
>      lacks DRI and directfb. This includes not using lib-directfb in the
>      build-depends for hurd-i386. It also creates a new debian config,
>      debian-indirect, which is used when building for HURD. This config is
>      invoked in the debian-dri config on hurd-i386. Thanks to Cyril Brulebois
>      for the patch, Michael Banck, Michel D??nzer, and Samuel Thibault for
>      input on an appropriate fix. (closes: #358065)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: