[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: Re: Bug#413040: graphicsmagick: Segfault during conversion from XWD coder.



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 413040 + patch
Bug#413040: graphicsmagick: Segfault during conversion from XWD coder.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> clone 413040 -1
Bug#413040: graphicsmagick: Segfault during conversion from XWD coder.
Bug 413040 cloned as bug 414045.

> clone 413040 -2
Bug#413040: graphicsmagick: Segfault during conversion from XWD coder.
Bug 413040 cloned as bug 414046.

> reassign -1 libx11 2:1.0.3-5
Bug#414045: graphicsmagick: Segfault during conversion from XWD coder.
Bug reassigned from package `graphicsmagick' to `libx11'.

> retitle -1 libX11: Buffer overflow in XGetPixel().
Bug#414045: graphicsmagick: Segfault during conversion from XWD coder.
Changed Bug title.

> severity -1 critical
Bug#414045: libX11: Buffer overflow in XGetPixel().
Severity set to `critical' from `important'

> tag -1 + patch
Bug#414045: libX11: Buffer overflow in XGetPixel().
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch

> tag -1 + security
Bug#414045: libX11: Buffer overflow in XGetPixel().
Tags were: patch
Tags added: security

> reassign -2 xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge3
Bug#414046: graphicsmagick: Segfault during conversion from XWD coder.
Bug reassigned from package `graphicsmagick' to `xlibs'.

> retitle -2 libX11: Buffer overflow in XGetPixel().
Bug#414046: graphicsmagick: Segfault during conversion from XWD coder.
Changed Bug title.

> severity -2 critical
Bug#414046: libX11: Buffer overflow in XGetPixel().
Severity set to `critical' from `important'

> tag -2 + patch
Bug#414046: libX11: Buffer overflow in XGetPixel().
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch

> tag -2 + security
Bug#414046: libX11: Buffer overflow in XGetPixel().
Tags were: patch
Tags added: security

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Reply to: