[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#139853: marked as done (xdm: daemon fails to start when using lpp)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Mar 2007 23:43:59 +0100
with message-id <45E7572F.9070600@ens-lyon.org>
and subject line Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: kernel-patch-lpp
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: normal

I compiled the kernel, using the kernel-source-2.4.18 package, with the
kernel-patch-lpp patch applied.  I also applied the
kernel-patch-preempt-2.4 patch, as well as the crypto patch from
kerneli.org.  As described in the README.Debian, I copied the contributed
rc and rcS shell scripts into /etc/init.d after making backups.

I use xdm to manage X sessions.  Prior to using the LPP, xdm would start
automatically after bootup.  Subsequently, xdm will not start if LPP is
used.  That is, if the `append="console=/dev/tty2 CONSOLE=/dev/tty2"' 
and `vga=0x301' lines are omitted (commented out) in /etc/lilo.conf, 
thereby disabling the graphical boot screen, then xdm /will/ start, even
though I am still using the contributed rc and rcS scripts.  However, 
if the graphical boot screen is enabled, using the /same/ rc and rcS 
scripts, xdm will /not/ start.  It will start manually, however; if I
login as root and run `/etc/init.d/xdm start' then xdm will start
normally.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux cherokee 2.4.18-k7 #1 Mon Mar 25 10:15:53 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=

Versions of packages kernel-patch-lpp depends on:
ii  patch                         2.5.4-10   Apply a diff file to an original

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Closing since the submitter's address is invalid. If anybody ever
reproduces this problem, feel free to reopen.

Brice

--- End Message ---
Reply to: