Bug#384105: /usr/X11R6/bin/X: X server slow

[Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@ens-lyon.org>]

severity 384105 wishlist
clone 384105 -1
reassign 384105 xterm
retitle 384105 xterm: terminal is slow
reassign -1 gnome-terminal
retitle -1 gnome-terminal: terminal is slow
thank you




Paul Szabo wrote:
>> So this is not a X server problem, this is just a matter of how the X
>> terminal is implemented. So unless you have a good reason, I will close
>> this bug. You may want to complain to the developer of your X terminal...
>>     
>
> I see. Would it be possible for you to reassign to the xterm and
> gnome-terminal packages, instead of closing the bug?
>   

Done. I have cloned it and reassigned one instance to xterm and one to
gnome-terminal.
I updated the title and set the severity to wishlist. You should try to
come with actual numbers showing that these X terminals were faster
before. Once we know that it is a regression, and not just a "slow"
implementation, the severity could be raised.

> Will Etch have Xorg, and if so will it be replacing XFree86 or as an
> alternative?

Etch will have Xorg 7.1 only, there is no XFree86 in Debian anymore.

Brice