[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#152505: xnest: Please fix this bug, which is still annoying diligent users



Package: xnest
Version: 2:1.1.1-15
Followup-For: Bug #152505

I have been caught out by this bug before, and just now again: the
first time was long enough ago that this time I had forgotten the
first time. Branden suggests reading the X FAQ. I can't find it on my
system. Branden said it was under /usr/share/doc/xfree86-common, but
it's not in the successor package, x11-common. Hmm, google:

http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/FAQ

OK, now I can see a question about Xnest, and it says I should use
xephyr. OK, I try that, but I get exactly the same problem. Now I read
the question, and it tells me what to do. And the script works.

So, why am I still writing this? Because I shouldn't have to ransack
the BTS and go chasing across the web just to run a nested X server.
Please can you package the wrapper script as /usr/bin/X{ephyr,nest},
then everything will just work? Or package the script under another
name, add a note to the man pages about it, and preferably put a
comment in the script or man pages explaining why you can't just
install the wrapper as the name of the program it wraps.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages xnest depends on:
ii  libc6                        2.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libx11-6                     2:1.0.3-4   X11 client-side library
ii  libxau6                      1:1.0.1-2   X11 authorisation library
ii  libxdmcp6                    1:1.0.1-2   X11 Display Manager Control Protoc
ii  libxext6                     1:1.0.1-2   X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxfont1                    1:1.2.2-1   X11 font rasterisation library

xnest recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



Reply to: