[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

libdmx: Changes to 'svn-7.1'

New branch 'svn-7.1' available with the following commits:
commit 728e66186f213a09ead1295c4a0a2bca5547d2bc
Author: Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>
Date:   Sat Aug 19 12:29:06 2006 +0000

    All dbg packages in lib should have priority extra,
    see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/08/msg00737.html

commit ca84b252a66ae77681b26c33c37ec2a2e93139ab
Author: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
Date:   Tue Aug 1 15:29:08 2006 +0000

    Use only the major version, minor version, and major patch number
    components of the Policy Manual revision in Standards-Version, because "the
    minor patch level will be changed when only cosmetic, typographical or
    other edits are made which neither change the meaning of the document nor
    affect the contents of packages".  See Policy Manual §5.6.11.
    (The real reason for this commit, as with r2615, is to test tweaks to the
    repository's commit-email.pl script.)

commit 8989c76af7b50bca4da138a1c5a2f0715f79cb4c
Author: Andres Salomon <dilinger@debian.org>
Date:   Mon Jul 17 04:44:49 2006 +0000

    Idempotency fixes; everywhere where we're using a separate build directory,
    we tend to create it via "mkdir obj-$(foo)".  This doesn't work if rebuilding,
    because the directory already exists.  Instead, only create it if there's
    no directory there already.

commit 3a5743d0f187fc960b555f0990ab61c9ce61b290
Author: David Nusinow <dnusinow@debian.org>
Date:   Mon Jul 3 20:14:04 2006 +0000

    * New upstream release
    * Bump debhelper compat to 5
    * Remove extra dependency on x11-common in -dev package
    * Bump standards version to
    * Run dh_install with --list-missing
    * Don't try and install header files for -dev package anymore, they're not

commit 7577b874567502e83c0d505f0d5c1695a41cd3b6
Author: David Nusinow <dnusinow@debian.org>
Date:   Mon Jul 3 20:01:11 2006 +0000

    Merge vendor drop of libdmx 1.0.2 to 7.1 working branch

Reply to: