Bug#349462: marked as done (xterm: wrong update-alternatives man page x-terminal-emulator.1.gz)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:17:02 +0000
with message-id <E1Gw5Fe-00061k-Gb@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#349462: fixed in xterm 222-1etch1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: xterm: wrong update-alternatives man page x-terminal-emulator.1.gz
- From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:37:32 +0100
- Message-id: <20060123073732.GA13973@dixsept.loria.fr>
Package: xterm
Version: 208-3.1
Severity: normal
I get the following error:
dixsept:~> man x-terminal-emulator
man: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/x-terminal-emulator.1.gz is a dangling symlink
No manual entry for x-terminal-emulator
dixsept:~> update-alternatives --display x-terminal-emulator
x-terminal-emulator - status is manual.
link currently points to /usr/bin/uxterm
/usr/bin/mlterm - priority 20
slave x-terminal-emulator.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/mlterm.1.gz
/usr/bin/aterm-xterm - priority 20
slave x-terminal-emulator.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/aterm.1.gz
/usr/bin/gnome-terminal.wrapper - priority 40
slave x-terminal-emulator.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/gnome-terminal.1.gz
/usr/bin/xfce4-terminal.wrapper - priority 40
slave x-terminal-emulator.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/xfce4-terminal.wrapper.1.gz
/usr/bin/rxvt-xpm - priority 8
slave x-terminal-emulator.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/rxvt.1.gz
/usr/bin/rxvt-xterm - priority 10
slave x-terminal-emulator.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/rxvt.1.gz
/usr/bin/xterm - priority 20
slave x-terminal-emulator.1x.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/xterm.1x.gz
/usr/bin/uxterm - priority 20
slave x-terminal-emulator.1x.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/uxterm.1x.gz
/usr/bin/koi8rxterm - priority 20
slave x-terminal-emulator.1x.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/koi8rxterm.1x.gz
/usr/bin/lxterm - priority 30
slave x-terminal-emulator.1x.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/lxterm.1x.gz
Current `best' version is /usr/bin/gnome-terminal.wrapper.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.4-20051215
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages xterm depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.5-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library
ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libice6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libncurses5 5.5-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libsm6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Session Management
ii libx11-6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxaw8 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Athena widget set library
ii libxext6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii libxft2 2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii libxmu6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System miscellaneous util
ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0.2-1 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii libxt6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii xlibs-data 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System client data
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-9 compression library - runtime
Versions of packages xterm recommends:
ii xutils 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System utility programs
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xterm
Source-Version: 222-1etch1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xterm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xterm_222-1etch1.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xterm/xterm_222-1etch1.diff.gz
xterm_222-1etch1.dsc
to pool/main/x/xterm/xterm_222-1etch1.dsc
xterm_222-1etch1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xterm/xterm_222-1etch1_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 349462@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Cristau <julien.cristau@ens-lyon.org> (supplier of updated xterm package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:35:47 +0100
Source: xterm
Binary: xterm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 222-1etch1
Distribution: testing
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force <debian-x@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Julien Cristau <julien.cristau@ens-lyon.org>
Description:
xterm - X terminal emulator
Closes: 349462
Changes:
xterm (222-1etch1) testing; urgency=low
.
* Use x-terminal-emulator.1.gz as slave alternative, instead of
x-terminal-emulator.1x.gz. That's what other terminal emulators use, and
what xterm used to do. We also need to clean up the mess this wrong path
caused, and make sure that the x-terminal-emulator.1.gz link in
/usr/share/man/man1/ is still there, for the benefit of testing users. If
it disappeared, we add it back in postinst. Thanks to Vincent Lefevre and
Joey Hess (closes: #349462).
Files:
4f815cc1cc6b841f2365f34f32c70caf 823 x11 optional xterm_222-1etch1.dsc
52a383b05609542e32482075633debd7 61780 x11 optional xterm_222-1etch1.diff.gz
b7eb071fb8fdbcfef2fcdbe4739f9f68 404716 x11 optional xterm_222-1etch1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFhcujIae1O4AJae8RAqUBAJwPXnO98HNSIaQLmJX/JE5dStjS4gCeJSXD
Y4DKWxn9dCVJy+RqRkKGxLM=
=JiJU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: