Bug#305540: marked as done (xterm: compile with --enable-256-color)
Your message dated Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:49:34 +0100
with message-id <[🔎] 200601111149.36016.ender@debian.org>
and subject line Closing bugs fixed in xterm 208-1.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Apr 2005 16:34:00 +0000
>From miernik@ffii.org Wed Apr 20 09:34:00 2005
Return-path: <miernik@ffii.org>
Received: from (szrenica.ctnet.pl) [82.160.30.99]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DOI9H-0007nP-00; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:34:00 -0700
Received: from miernik by szrenica.ctnet.pl with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DOI8B-00072a-31; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:32:51 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Miernik <miernik@ffii.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: xterm: compile with --enable-256-color
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:32:49 +0200
Message-Id: <E1DOI8B-00072a-31@szrenica.ctnet.pl>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xterm
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1
Severity: wishlist
Could the Debian XTerm be compiled with --enable-256-color passed to
./configure ?
ELinks http://www.elinks.or.cz/download.html is a great textmode
webbrowser, and now it supports 256 color mode, which looks really great
(you have to use the CVS debs from
deb http://www.ffii.org/~miernik/debian sid main
to have it enabled), try it!
If there is a reason not to do it, could another package be provided
with xterm with 236 color enabled, or can someone recommend another
terminal emulatr which can do this?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-386
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages xterm depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libexpat1 1.95.8-1 XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii libfontconfig1 2.3.1-2 generic font configuration library
ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Session Management
ii libxaw7 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Athena widget set library
ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii libxft2 2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii libxmu6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous util
ii libxpm4 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X pixmap library
ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii xlibs-data 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Window System client data
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 305540-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2006 09:49:39 +0000
>From ender@debian.org Wed Jan 11 01:49:39 2006
Return-path: <ender@debian.org>
Received: from cerrojo.elmundo.es ([193.110.128.12] helo=mail2.elmundo.es)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ewcbq-000636-Rp; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:49:39 -0800
Received: from xanes.el-mundo.int (xanes.elmundo.int [10.5.222.50])
by mail2.elmundo.es (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 698EF4614E; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:49:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix, from userid 65500)
id A2A3E17315; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:49:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ip6-localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 3AB3B17313; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:49:37 +0100 (CET)
From: David =?iso-8859-15?q?Mart=EDnez_Moreno?= <ender@debian.org>
Organization: Debian
To: 305540-done@bugs.debian.org, 311438-done@bugs.debian.org,
315195-done@bugs.debian.org, 318280-done@bugs.debian.org,
318513-done@bugs.debian.org, 324352-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Closing bugs fixed in xterm 208-1.
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:49:34 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
Cc: debian-x@lists.debian.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart19950491.dvbdj3BgAt";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[🔎] 200601111149.36016.ender@debian.org>
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.395205, version=0.10.3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SORTED_RECIPS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--nextPart19950491.dvbdj3BgAt
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Version: 208-1
David Nusinow forgot to run dpkg-buildpackage with -v option, in order to=
=20
close bugs from previous version. All these bugs were closed by xterm=20
204-0pre1 in experimental, and 208-1 in unstable.
Best regards,
Ender.
=2D-=20
Another C-3PO: E chu ta!
C-3PO: How rude!
-- C-3PO (The Empire Strikes Back).
=2D-
Desarrollador de Debian
Debian developer
--nextPart19950491.dvbdj3BgAt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDxOK/Ws/EhA1iABsRAgyXAJ9btqI83VKMODMnHZq2qpxfLWqHdgCg5nWf
DUWNgTZfS6O1ecWDlqKZA00=
=WvxL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart19950491.dvbdj3BgAt--
Reply to: