[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#396032: xserver-xorg-video-vesa: [vesa] corrupted display (non 1024x768) on Matrox Millenium P650e



On Di November 14 2006 21:23, Peter Pöschl wrote:
> This are the diffs to several variations of xorg.conf:
>
> --- Xorg.0.log-1280_1024-shadow_fb-off  2006-11-13 21:47:36.000000000 +0100
> +++ Xorg.0.log-1280_1024-shadow_fb-on   2006-11-14 20:22:44.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1504,8 +1510,3 @@
>      xkb_compatibility        { include "complete" };
>      xkb_symbols              { include "pc(pc105)+de(nodeadkeys)" };
>      xkb_geometry             { include "pc(pc105)" };
> -    xkb_keycodes             { include "xfree86+aliases(qwertz)" };
> -    xkb_types                { include "complete" };
> -    xkb_compatibility        { include "complete" };
> -    xkb_symbols              { include "pc(pc105)+de" };
> -    xkb_geometry             { include "pc(pc105)" };
>
>
>
> --- Xorg.0.log-1600_1200-shadow_fb-off  2006-11-14 20:36:53.000000000 +0100
> +++ Xorg.0.log-1280_1024-shadow_fb-off  2006-11-13 21:47:36.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1509,3 +1504,8 @@
>      xkb_compatibility        { include "complete" };
>      xkb_symbols              { include "pc(pc105)+de(nodeadkeys)" };
>      xkb_geometry             { include "pc(pc105)" };
> +    xkb_keycodes             { include "xfree86+aliases(qwertz)" };
> +    xkb_types                { include "complete" };
> +    xkb_compatibility        { include "complete" };
> +    xkb_symbols              { include "pc(pc105)+de" };
> +    xkb_geometry             { include "pc(pc105)" };

I wonder where these diffs are coming from. I copy/pasted the Screen section 
in xorg.conf, to have one for each resolution. The only changes between 
yesterday's logs were to switch comments in

Section "ServerLayout"
	Identifier	"Default Layout"
	Screen		"Iiyama@Matrox 650P 1600x1200"
#	Screen		"Iiyama@Matrox 650P 1280x1024"
#	Screen		"Iiyama@Matrox 650P 1024x768"
	InputDevice	"Generic Keyboard"
	InputDevice	"Logitech MX510"
EndSection



Reply to: