* X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > Author: beatle > Date: 2006-11-10 03:40:03 -0500 (Fri, 10 Nov 2006) > New Revision: 3978 > > Added: > branches/experimental/mesa/configs/debian-dri-optimized-default > Removed: > branches/experimental/mesa/configs/debian-utils > Modified: > branches/experimental/mesa/configs/debian-dri-default > branches/experimental/mesa/configs/debian-dri-i386-i686 > branches/experimental/mesa/debian/rules > Log: > Build Mesa utility programs (glxdemo, glxgears, glxheads, glxinfo) together > with the DRI/GLX-enabled libGL. Don't build the utilities on CPU-optimized > configurations. [...] I forget to bring this up on the mailing list. I thought it was funny that mesa-utils was apparently not built from the sources in the mesa source package. While I'm aware that the utilities themselves don't really change that much, I still think it would be useful to provide them by the mesa package. That way they'll always be automatically up-to-date. It is also one package less needing updates. Since the Debian XSF is the current maintainer of the mesa-utils package, I wanted to ask on this list whether there were any objections to having mesa provide the mesa-utils package. Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature