* Michael Biebl wrote: > I second that request. > Imho it would be best to *not* rename the compiz binary to compiz.real, I disagree. Running compiz.real directly only makes sense if you know exactly what you're doing. Running without arguments won't do much good, starting it without running gtk-window-decorator is not what you'd normally want. > but instead provide wrapper scripts like compiz-aiglx (and probably > compiz-nvidia, compiz-xgl) which start compiz with the correct set of > flags for the given environment. I don't like this alternative very much because it will probably duplicate a lot of code in the wrappers. > If you don't want to go this way of distinct wrapper scripts, your > single compiz wrapper script would have to be clever enough to choose > the right set of flags itself. This is more like what I had in mind. Ideally the wrapper should just Do The Right Thing dependending on which server/driver combination is running. - Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature