[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3376 - in trunk/debian/xorg/debian: . local



Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-09-19 20:33:54 -0400 (Tue, 19 Sep 2006)
New Revision: 3376

Modified:
   trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
   trunk/debian/xorg/debian/local/dexconf
Log:
* Revert ZAxisMapping patch stolen from ubuntu. The server should default
  to a more extensive mapping now anyway, so scroll thingies will work by
  default without this.


Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog	2006-09-19 16:08:55 UTC (rev 3375)
+++ trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog	2006-09-20 00:33:54 UTC (rev 3376)
@@ -36,8 +36,6 @@
     - Added Finnish (Tapio Lehtonen). Closes: #387391
 
   [ David Nusinow ]
-  * Steal patch from Ubuntu by Fabio to unconditionally enable ZAxisMapping in
-    dexconf
   * Update xsfbs with patch from ubuntu to support ARCHITECTURE, LAPTOP,
     RECONFIGURE, FIRSTINST, and UPGRADE variables for use in the xserver-xorg
     config scripting
@@ -66,7 +64,7 @@
     wouldn't match anything, because the epoch is not part of the upstream
     version number.  Thanks to Thomas Lange for diagnosing this bug!
 
- -- Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>  Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:03:25 -0400
+ -- David Nusinow <dnusinow@debian.org>  Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:32:55 -0400
 
 xorg (1:7.1.0~1) experimental; urgency=low
 

Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/local/dexconf
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/xorg/debian/local/dexconf	2006-09-19 16:08:55 UTC (rev 3375)
+++ trunk/debian/xorg/debian/local/dexconf	2006-09-20 00:33:54 UTC (rev 3376)
@@ -289,7 +289,6 @@
 	Option		"CorePointer"
 	Option		"Device"		"/dev/input/mice"
 	Option		"Protocol"		"ExplorerPS/2"
-    Option      "ZAxisMapping"  "4 5"
 SECTION
 if [ -n "$DO_EMULATE3BUTTONS" ]; then
   printf "\tOption\t\t\"Emulate3Buttons\"\t\"true\"\n" >&4



Reply to: