Bug#384204: 32-bit biarch support
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:10:54AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:28:19PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Ok, if I understood correctly, changes in comparison with what we have now
> > are:
> >
> > - A more standarised pathset, instead of just /emul/ia32-linux. According to
> > http://wiki.debian.org/toolchain-multiarch, there are plans to make the
> > toolchain aware of the new paths. Sounds a lot like post-etch, but AFAIK
> > we can do the same without it (by using --libdir at build time, and adequate
> > /etc/ld.so.conf at runtime)
> >
> > - dpkg / dak / katie major rework (I haven't read in-depth, but I assume the
> > point is using the same ia32 code from the i386 port without compiling it
> > separately. Definitely post-etch..)
> >
> > Did I miss something? Is someone able to guess which of them is Daniel
> > concerned with?
>
> And the crucial points:
> - generalised: works on any architecture, not just amd64/i386,
> - non-intrusive: dak/dpkg changes are easy. changing every package to
> have such horrendous hacks as this, with hardcoded
> triplets, is never going to fly,
> - cleaner: see previous two.
Ok I give up. Would be nice if someone had told me when I filed #381342 19 days
ago, though.
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is honeypot@aybabtu.com. Note: this address is only intended for
spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list.
Reply to: