Re: Bug#384204: 32-bit biarch support
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:19:29PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:22:48PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Patch attached for 32-bit biarch support (lib32sm6 and lib32sm-dev).
> >
> > (needs lib32ice first)
>
> Um, why don't you focus your energies on proper multiarch support
> instead of trying to propagate hacks like this further than they need to
> be?
Despite Daniel's rather gruff treatment of the topic, from what little I've
heard on the subject I'm inclined to agree with him. Multiarch is widely
accepted to be the proper fix, so I'm just going to close these reports in
the next few days unless there's a good reason to leave them around.
- David Nusinow
Reply to: