[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#261544: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: X server uses C library's alarm() function)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 23:50:21 +0300
with message-id <20060812205021.GS5396@fooishbar.org>
and subject line ... yeah?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.1.0-16woody3
Severity: normal

strace shows this activity:

--- SIGALRM (Alarm clock) ---
sigreturn()                             = ? (mask now [])
--- SIGALRM (Alarm clock) ---
sigreturn()                             = ? (mask now [])
--- SIGALRM (Alarm clock) ---
sigreturn()                             = ? (mask now [])
--- SIGALRM (Alarm clock) ---
sigreturn()                             = ? (mask now [])
--- SIGALRM (Alarm clock) ---
sigreturn()                             = ? (mask now [])

I can hold our for a day or two, and run commands via gdb
to gather more information if you like.  Let me know, so
I can be up and running if the report becomes superficial.

Thanks,


Scott.

btw, my hotmail address is cvgscote. I refuse to post an actual email address
like supaplex@pcbkits.com in the plain on bts, because I receive too much spam
(that's a spam trap now anyway...)  Please see that you do not repost my actual
email address, or allow it to be posted in anyway. (this will prevent evil
robots from scraping up my email ... )

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux fs.daxal.com 2.4.27-rc3 #1 SMP Tue Jul 6 10:15:25 MDT 2004 i686 unknown

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
This is entirely expected behaviour for the smart scheduler.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: