Re: xserver-xorg-driver-synaptics [was: Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5]
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 02:13:33PM -0400, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 07:58:37PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 19:41 +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > > yeah, of course this is why the dependency is there :)
> > > But what if xserver-xorg-core already depends on input drivers?
> >
> > That's the other direction, but FWIW, IIRC there was half a consensus to
> > move these dependencies from xserver-xorg-core to xserver-xorg to break
> > the dependency cycle.
>
> Right, which is the only approach that's even vaguely sane. The only
> relationships -core should have are versioned Conflicts, if it breaks
> the ABI and you really care that much.
Right, this is what it should be. If it's not, it's a fuckup on my part
obviously.
- David Nusinow
Reply to: