On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 03:56:00AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Jul 8, 2006 at 21:42:11 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > I'm raising the severity of this bug to critical because, although > > xorg-server was never compiled in s390 before (thus bug was filed with > > severity: important), it provides binary packages like xvfb that used to > > be available for s390 and now are not, causing other packages to FTBFS > > due to unmet build-dependencies. > > xorg-server shouldn't even try to build Xorg on s390. Maybe the > attached patch helps? It disables xorg and xdmx on this arch, but > leaves xvfb and xnest enabled. > Totally untested, as I don't have access to the hardware :) Xorg provides a dummy video driver and a void input driver, so yes, building Xorg is perfectly valid. Cheers, Daniel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature