[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#373711: here's a copyright file



tags 373711 patch
thanks for stopping processing here!
--
I have tried to create a valid copyright file for this package.  It is
attached to this email.

I wasn't sure of where this package was originally downloaded from, I
simply put http://x.org this should possibly be corrected with a more
accurate url.

I'm CCing Daniel Stone, since he seems to be the original re-packager.
(Original re-packager seems contradictory, doesn't it?)

Thanks!

stew
Original Debian package author(s): Stephen Early, Mark Eichin, Branden 
  Robinson, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi, Daniel Stone

The sofware was later repackaged by:
  Daniel Stone <daniel.stone@ubuntu.com> on Mon, 16 May 2005 22:10:17 +1000

The software was originally downloaded from http://x.org

Copyright:

Copyright 1991 by Digital Equipment Corporation, Maynard, Massachusetts,
and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

License:
                        All Rights Reserved

Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its 
documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, 
provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that
both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in 
supporting documentation, and that the names of Digital or MIT not be
used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the
software without specific, written prior permission.  

DIGITAL DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE, INCLUDING
ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS, IN NO EVENT SHALL
DIGITAL BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR
ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS,
WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION,
ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS
SOFTWARE.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: