X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2473 - branches/7.1/proto/fixesproto/debian
Author: dilinger
Date: 2006-07-17 04:35:49 -0400 (Mon, 17 Jul 2006)
New Revision: 2473
Modified:
branches/7.1/proto/fixesproto/debian/changelog
branches/7.1/proto/fixesproto/debian/control
Log:
* Change debhelper build-dep-indep to a normal build-dep, as dh_clean
is called inside the clean rule.
One final commit to shut lintian up..
Modified: branches/7.1/proto/fixesproto/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- branches/7.1/proto/fixesproto/debian/changelog 2006-07-17 08:32:34 UTC (rev 2472)
+++ branches/7.1/proto/fixesproto/debian/changelog 2006-07-17 08:35:49 UTC (rev 2473)
@@ -2,14 +2,16 @@
* Test for obj-$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) before creating it during build;
idempotency fix.
- * Run dh_install w/ --list-missing.
+ * Run dh_install w/ --list-missing.
* Ack NMU.
* Bump standards version to 3.7.2.0.
* Drop duplicate x11-common dep for x11proto-fixes-dev.
* Version x11-common pre-dep in x11proto-fixes-dev to 1:7.0.0 to match
the rest of Debian.
+ * Change debhelper build-dep-indep to a normal build-dep, as dh_clean
+ is called inside the clean rule.
- -- Andres Salomon <dilinger@debian.org> Mon, 17 Jul 2006 01:23:31 -0400
+ -- Andres Salomon <dilinger@debian.org> Mon, 17 Jul 2006 04:34:18 -0400
x11proto-fixes (4.0-0.1) experimental; urgency=low
Modified: branches/7.1/proto/fixesproto/debian/control
===================================================================
--- branches/7.1/proto/fixesproto/debian/control 2006-07-17 08:32:34 UTC (rev 2472)
+++ branches/7.1/proto/fixesproto/debian/control 2006-07-17 08:35:49 UTC (rev 2473)
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force <debian-x@lists.debian.org>
Uploaders: David Nusinow <dnusinow@debian.org>, Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>, Fabio M. Di Nitto <fabbione@fabbione.net>
-Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.0.0)
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0)
Standards-Version: 3.7.2.0
Package: x11proto-fixes-dev
Reply to: