[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#368858: Does it still segfault?



reassign 368858 lyx-xforms
tag 368858 help
thanks

Denis Barbier:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote:
> > > It looks a bit like this:
> > > 
> > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/05/msg00518.html
> > > 
> > > Although not affecting as many apps..
> > 
> > Well, in any case it seems like it's a bug in the X libraries so I'm
> > reassigning it to libx11-6.
> 
> Can you please reassign it back to lyx-xforms?
> At the moment, there is nothing in this bugreport to support your claim
> that it is caused by libx11-6.  The backtrace shows
>  0xa7db4cb8 in XFindOnExtensionList (structure=0xc09, number=1040697125)
> and these arguments look clearly wrong, but we do not know where they do
> come from.
> Please work first with bug submitter to reproduce it, and then reassign
> it to libx11-6 if there is indeed a bug there, with explanations on how
> to reproduce it.  I am afraid that Debian X maintainers cannot investigate
> random bugs in any X application.
> For instance, the following informations may be helpful:
>  * Is X a local or remote display?
>  * Does it crash when launched from a newly created account?
>  * Does it crash at startup, or when processing a particular file?
>  * Any special in user configuration?
>  ...

OK, I understand. I thought that this was maybe a known bug.

I think lyx-xforms is deprecated anyway.

-- 
Pelle



Reply to: