[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#362767: marked as done (x11-common: should not conflict with xfs <= 1:1.0.1-4)

Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 23:41:45 -0400
with message-id <20060517034145.GE7815@localdomain>
and subject line Bug#362767: x11-common: should not conflict with xfs <= 1:1.0.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.0.11
Severity: normal


It looks like x11-common conflicts with 
xfs <= 1:1.0.1-4 , as a part of the /usr/X11R6/bin-run, but it might be
a false positive:

$ dpkg -L xfs
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/xfs
/usr/share/doc/xfs/README.Debian
/usr/share/doc/xfs/copyright
/usr/share/doc/xfs/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/share/man
/usr/share/man/man1
/usr/share/man/man1/xfs.1x.gz
/usr/bin
/usr/bin/xfs
/usr/lib
/usr/lib/X11
/usr/lib/X11/fs
/usr/lib/X11/fs/config
/etc
/etc/init.d
/etc/init.d/xfs
/etc/X11/fs/config
/etc/X11/fs/xfs.options

$ dpkg -s xfs | grep ^Version
Version: 1:1.0.1-4


and according to the latest list from Steve Langasek, it should only
conflict with the 6.9 and earlier series.

(Or have I missed something?)

/Sune



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages x11-common depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]         1.4.72     Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils                   2.15.5     Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  laptop-detect                 0.12.1     attempt to detect a laptop
ii  lsb-base                      3.1-3      Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip

x11-common recommends no packages.

-- debconf information excluded

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Sune,

On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 02:13:59PM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> Package: x11-common
> Version: 1:7.0.11
> Severity: normal
> 
> 
> It looks like x11-common conflicts with 
> xfs <= 1:1.0.1-4 , as a part of the /usr/X11R6/bin-run, but it might be
> a false positive:
> 
> $ dpkg -L xfs
> /.
> /usr
> /usr/share
> /usr/share/doc
> /usr/share/doc/xfs
> /usr/share/doc/xfs/README.Debian
> /usr/share/doc/xfs/copyright
> /usr/share/doc/xfs/changelog.Debian.gz
> /usr/share/man
> /usr/share/man/man1
> /usr/share/man/man1/xfs.1x.gz
> /usr/bin
> /usr/bin/xfs
> /usr/lib
> /usr/lib/X11
> /usr/lib/X11/fs
> /usr/lib/X11/fs/config
> /etc
> /etc/init.d
> /etc/init.d/xfs
> /etc/X11/fs/config
> /etc/X11/fs/xfs.options
> 
> $ dpkg -s xfs | grep ^Version
> Version: 1:1.0.1-4
> 
> 
> and according to the latest list from Steve Langasek, it should only
> conflict with the 6.9 and earlier series.
> 
> (Or have I missed something?)

So the reason for this that I botched this transition in the past, causing
xfs to be misinstalled in some cases. In order to correct for that, we had
to conflict with some of the old modular packages for the same reason that
we had to conflict with the monolithic ones. Anyhow, I've uploaded a new
xfs that makes this bug pretty pointless anyway, so I'm just closing it.
Thanks for the report and sorry it took me so long to reply.

 - David Nusinow

--- End Message ---
Reply to: