[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#366114: Doesn't work with current CVS as well



Michel Dänzer schrieb am Mi, 10. Mai 2006, um 11:24:57 +0200:
> It would be great if you could try with a DRM built from DRI CVS, see
> 
> http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/Building#head-59338b545aa94fe7570b689a9f9f850f53f732ca
> http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/Building#head-d3dcc7d83ae38d3b36f7f23ddcd4f5268396b2b4
> 

The crash also occurs with today's CVS.  These are the diffs in the
log file (against the one I posted before):

14c14
< (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Tue May  9 12:24:09 2006
---
> (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Thu May 11 13:59:35 2006
550c550
< (II) RADEON(0): [dri] Found DRI library version 1.2.0 and kernel module version 1.22.0
---
> (II) RADEON(0): [dri] Found DRI library version 1.2.0 and kernel module version 1.24.0
560,561d559
< (WW) RADEON(0): [dri] limiting video memory to one aperture of 65536K
< (WW) RADEON(0): [dri] detected radeon kernel module version 1.22 but 1.23 or newer is required for full memory mapping.
843,844c841,842
< (II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 8192 byte SAREA at 0xe0a91000
< (II) RADEON(0): [drm] mapped SAREA 0xe0a91000 to 0xa78e6000
---
> (II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 8192 byte SAREA at 0xe0a94000
> (II) RADEON(0): [drm] mapped SAREA 0xe0a94000 to 0xa78e6000
858a857
> (**) RADEON(0): DRI New memory map param
913c912
< (WW) RADEON(0):   MC_AGP_LOCATION was: 0xffffffc0 is: 0xd47fd400
---
> (WW) RADEON(0):   MC_AGP_LOCATION was: 0xffffffc0 is: 0xd87fd800
1008a1008
> (II) 3rd Button detected: disabling emulate3Button


> On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 20:31 +0200, Sven Marnach wrote:
> > Michel Dänzer schrieb am Di, 09. Mai 2006, um 15:07:44 +0200:
> > > Also, if you're using Option "AGPMode" or any other AGP/DRI related
> > > options, does disabling them make a difference?
> > 
> > I don't understand what it means to "disable" the Option "AGPMode".
> 
> Just don't specify it or comment it out, but the log file you provided
> looks like that's already the case.

I would have expected that the xorg.conf file I provided shows that I
already did that -- thus my confusion.

Greetings,
    Sven



Reply to: