On Thu, May 4, 2006 at 22:55:38 -0400, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > Author: dnusinow > Date: 2006-05-04 22:55:36 -0400 (Thu, 04 May 2006) > New Revision: 2097 > > Log: > * Tell the configuration scripts that we're upgrading properly. The variable > that was being used to test this was never set for some reason. > > Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/x11-common.postinst.in > =================================================================== > --- trunk/debian/xorg/debian/x11-common.postinst.in 2006-05-05 02:16:37 UTC (rev 2096) > +++ trunk/debian/xorg/debian/x11-common.postinst.in 2006-05-05 02:55:36 UTC (rev 2097) > @@ -59,15 +59,15 @@ > > # only mess with config file it exists; otherwise, assume that's the way the > # user wants it, but only if upgrading > -if [ -e "$XWRAPPER_CONFIG" ] || [ -z "$UPGRADE" ]; then > +if [ -e "$XWRAPPER_CONFIG" ] || [ -n "$2" ]; then Hi, wasn't the UPGRADE variable supposed to be non-empty on upgrades? If so, [ -z "$UPGRADE" ] is true when we're *not* upgrading, whereas [ -n "$2" ] will be true on upgrades, so the test is backwards. If I'm mistaken about the semantics of $UPGRADE, then please disregard this message. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature