Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 11:44:38 +0200 with message-id <44587B86.5070505@gmx.de> and subject line not a bug in libx11-dev has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: need x-dev >= 6.8.2 for an Xfuncproto.h with _X_SENTINEL
- From: Robert Bihlmeyer <robbe@orcus.priv.at>
- Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 21:00:31 +0100
- Message-id: <20051105200031.5F6752D6FD4@hoss.orcus.priv.at>
Package: libx11-dev Version: 6.8.99.901.dfsg.1-1 Severity: normal Tags: experimental /usr/include/X11/Xlib.h uses the _X_SENTINEL macro, which is defined in Xfuncproto.h as shipped with x-dev 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 but not in 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 (from xfree86). So libx11-dev needs to depend on a suitably high version of x-dev. I encountered this bug when installing experimental packages in sarge/stable, but this may well apply to the etch/testing packages as well.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 337692-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: not a bug in libx11-dev
- From: Daniel Baulig <iparanoid@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 11:44:38 +0200
- Message-id: <44587B86.5070505@gmx.de>
- Reply-to: iparanoid@gmx.de
The updated problem was not a bug in libx11-dev.
--- End Message ---