[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#364838: xkb-data: systematically kills GNOME session during login



ke, 2006-04-26 kello 10:07 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine kirjoitti:
> ke, 2006-04-26 kello 07:47 +0100, Daniel Stone kirjoitti:
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 09:40:28AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > ke, 2006-04-26 kello 06:03 +0100, Daniel Stone kirjoitti:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 04:34:38AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > > > Since tonight's dinstall run, a libxklavier10 version that explicitely
> > > > > depends upon xkb-data entered Testing. This combination systematically 
> > > > > and repeatedly kills X.  After 4 hours of debuging, what fixed it was 
> > > > > "dpkg -P --force-depends xkb-data" (or alternately, pinning xkb-data 
> > > > > to priority -1 and reverting to the previous libxklavier10 release).
> > > > 
> > > > You need to be specific.  How does it 'kill' GNOME?  Can you attach your
> > > > xorg.conf?  Can you also attach your Xorg.0.log from a crashing session?
> > > > If GNOME gives you the dialog where it asks you to attach the output
> > > > from two commands if reporting a bug, can you attach the output from
> > > > those two commands?
> > > 
> > > X dies half-way through the GNOME session launching. Config and logs
> > > attached. GNOME does not give me that dialog; it dies before any of the
> > > desktop becomes visible.
> > 
> > The log you give doesn't show anything meaningful, except authentication
> > getting screwed up.  I assume the clients all die, which makes the
> > server exit, too: check ~/.xsession-errors.
> 
> .xsession-errors is empty.  
> 
> Grsecurity reports a signal 6 on X.org resulting from the death of child
> gnome-session.

Or actually:

Apr 26 01:36:19 omena kernel: grsec: signal 6 sent to /usr/X11R6/bin/Xorg[Xorg:26475] uid/euid:0/0 gid/egid:0/0, parent /usr/sbin/gdm[gdm:335] uid/euid:0/0 gid/egid:1000/111
Apr 26 01:36:19 omena gdm[335]: Error reinitilizing server

-- 
Martin-Éric Racine
http://q-funk.iki.fi



Reply to: