Bug#363267: marked as done (xutils-dev: Should drop -lXp dependency of Xaw)
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:17:09 -0700
with message-id <E1FW0NZ-0008Qw-Gh@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#363267: fixed in xutils-dev 1:1.0.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xutils-dev
Version: 1:1.0.2-2
Severity: important
Justification: causes FTBFS in numerous packages until libxp moves to /usr/lib
As the subject says: since libxaw8 is being dropped, the imake templates
should no longer make Xaw-using apps link against -lXp. This is currently
causing FTBFS in several packages; for example, from my build log for nas:
...
rm -f audemo
gcc -m32 -o audemo audemo.o -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing ../../../lib/audio/libaudio.a -lXt -lSM -lICE -lXext -lX11 -lm ../../../clients/audio/widgets/libwidgets.a -lXaw -lXmu -lXt -lSM -lICE -lXpm -lXp -lXext -lX11
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXp
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[4]: *** [audemo] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/nas-1.7/clients/audio/audemo'
make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/nas-1.7/clients/audio'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/nas-1.7/clients'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/nas-1.7'
make: *** [build] Error 2
(I see libxp is in incoming along with a couple associated packages. But
dropping the unnecessary -lXp is still a good idea.)
--
Daniel Schepler
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xutils-dev
Source-Version: 1:1.0.2-3
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xutils-dev, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xutils-dev_1.0.2-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xutils-dev/xutils-dev_1.0.2-3.diff.gz
xutils-dev_1.0.2-3.dsc
to pool/main/x/xutils-dev/xutils-dev_1.0.2-3.dsc
xutils-dev_1.0.2-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xutils-dev/xutils-dev_1.0.2-3_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 363267@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
David Nusinow <dnusinow@debian.org> (supplier of updated xutils-dev package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:53:55 -0400
Source: xutils-dev
Binary: xutils-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Nusinow <dnusinow@debian.org>
Changed-By: David Nusinow <dnusinow@debian.org>
Description:
xutils-dev - X Window System utility programs for development
Closes: 363267
Changes:
xutils-dev (1:1.0.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* debian/patches/xaw-without-xp: update the templates to not pull in
libXp as a dependency of libXaw, since libxaw8 is being dropped and
this is therefore no longer the case. Thanks to Daniel Schepler.
Closes: #363267.
Files:
59756a5285224e2687ec6c0b1d02cc2c 761 x11 optional xutils-dev_1.0.2-3.dsc
927c2f0fb784117a520db9facae00e85 41280 x11 optional xutils-dev_1.0.2-3.diff.gz
b426fc9a15b8da3eafdb199eed95e54e 297376 x11 optional xutils-dev_1.0.2-3_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFERX5byLfpNdY0ad8RAj/xAJ9VG5wwZs3nNR/3rDy8rdlCpHFY0QCfdBaw
yoEoQlC792YRScwRVG4D558=
=LLnh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: