On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 11:35:37PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 11:40:31AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 05:02:12AM +0300, Shai Berger wrote: > > > Then I tried the other method referred to in xkb-data's README.Debian, > > > that of passing a -xkbdir to the server. The server did not recognize > > > this flag (and gave me a list of the flags it did recognize...). > > > > I removed most of the XKB command-line options upstream. > > As users can inject any random data with xkbcomp, is it really safer? > IMHO this is just annoying without any security improvement. It's not for security reasons, it's because I don't believe it has any place on the command line. Config file, maybe, but why command line?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature