Bug#358357: marked as done (x11-common: trying to overwrite `/usr/include/X11', which is also in package libxft-dev)
Your message dated Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:07:35 +0100
with message-id <200603231007.36794@zion.black.co.at>
and subject line conflict with libxft-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: x11-common
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: important
Unpacking replacement x11-common ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/x11-common_6.9.0.dfsg.1-5_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/include/X11', which is also in package libxft-dev
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages x11-common depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.72 Debian configuration management sy
ii debianutils 2.15.3 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii lsb-base 3.0-16 Linux Standard Base 3.0 init scrip
x11-common recommends no packages.
-- debconf information:
x11-common/experimental_packages:
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi!
This bug was repaired with the xft 2.1.8.2-4 upload, which should be available
from todays unstable.
It already worked on my system. Feel free to reopen this bugreport or to
create a new one if you have any further troubles.
Regards, David
--
- hallo... wie gehts heute?
- *hust* gut *rotz* *keuch*
- gott sei dank kommunizieren wir über ein septisches medium ;)
-- Matthias Leeb, Uni f. angewandte Kunst, 2005-02-15
--- End Message ---
Reply to: