On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 06:46:44PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 10:34:31PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > I am not sure if the solution is to rebuild kdepim with the new xft, or > > > include libXft.la back, so I CC the xft maintainer, but something needs > > > to be done. > > Given that xft also supports pkg-config, AFAICT there's no specific reason > > that libxft-dev should need to include libXft.la anymore. The important > > thing is to know whether or not it's coming back, or whether we should > > requeue kdepim for rebuilding. > If it's as simple as a rebuild, then just requeue kdepim for rebuilding. > >From what I understand, the .pc files are superior to .la files, although > if I'm wrong someone should feel free to correct me. Rebuilds queued; closing the bug. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature