El Domingo, 17 de Julio de 2005 05:23, Steve Langasek escribió: > The current version of xlibs-dev is not fully backwards-compatible with > previous versions built from xfree86, because in the xorg tree a number of > packages have been split out of the xlibs-static-dev package, e.g., > libxxf86vm-dev. Packages that previously had a build-dependency on > xlibs-dev only now FTBFS; if the intention is to break backwards > compatibility, I think it would be better to drop the xlibs-dev package > altogether, otherwise these libs should be re-added to the dependencies of > xlibs-dev. Hello, Steve. I think that it was Branden's desire to drop completely xlibs-dev after sarge and choose whatever dependency you need from the libx*-dev miriad. So the second option will be, in my humble opinion, the path to follow. I do not speak on XSF's behalf, though. Best regards, Ender. -- - Where's Johns? - Which half? -- Imam & Riddick (Pitch Black). -- Debian developer
Attachment:
pgpjSYmprJMuW.pgp
Description: PGP signature