On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 05:47:01PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Wednesday 13 July 2005 05:27 pm, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > > Â They do use the same font size (called "Default" by xterm in both > > > cases); I'm not sure what you're getting at there. Â Maybe you mean that > > > they have different terminal sizes; I've updated the 'bad' one to use the > > > same terminal size as the 'good' one (for obvious reasons I can't take > > > another 'good' screenshot). > > > > The picture I see on the screen shows the bad one about 2/3 the width of > > the good one. > > I'm at a loss as to what's going on then, because the text is exactly the > same size for me. I just shaved one line off the bottom of the "bad" > terminal, and now they're exactly the same size, and I can flip between the > two images (e.g., in Firefox tabs) and see that the non-bold text is > identical. weird (but not my bug). I looked at them with Opera first, downloaded and looked again with xzgv. There is a different picture now than when I first looked. Anyway - I'm guessing that what you're looking at is #201 or #203. What I'd do to get more information would be to recompile with, using --enable-trace in the configure script. Then during initialization, the Trace-parent.out file would tell (usually) the information about the font that was actually used. (Running #200 and #202 here, I don't see a difference in the bold fonts). -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
Attachment:
pgpmD46OVu_9A.pgp
Description: PGP signature