[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r301 - in trunk/debian: . patches



Author: dnusinow
Date: 2005-07-02 16:15:36 -0500 (Sat, 02 Jul 2005)
New Revision: 301

Added:
   trunk/debian/patches/099t_xkb_remove_hidden_attributes.diff
Modified:
   trunk/debian/TODO
Log:
- Patch audit.  
  - Port 099t_xkb_remove_hidden_attributes.diff from xfree86 tree.


Modified: trunk/debian/TODO
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/TODO	2005-07-02 20:35:40 UTC (rev 300)
+++ trunk/debian/TODO	2005-07-02 21:15:36 UTC (rev 301)
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
   -- Upstream says that it's incorrect and due to a toolchain bug.
      Have to see whether it's still needed for GNU/kFreeBSD, and if so,
      fix the bug.  See Freedesktop Bugzilla #1902.
-099t_xkb_remove_hidden_attributes.diff -- needs porting
 099u_mkdirhier_rewrite.diff -- needs porting
 099v_fontserver_fix_SEGV.diff -- needs porting
 099x_xdm_support_logfile_rotation.diff -- needs porting

Added: trunk/debian/patches/099t_xkb_remove_hidden_attributes.diff
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/patches/099t_xkb_remove_hidden_attributes.diff	2005-07-02 20:35:40 UTC (rev 300)
+++ trunk/debian/patches/099t_xkb_remove_hidden_attributes.diff	2005-07-02 21:15:36 UTC (rev 301)
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+$Id$
+
+The basic variant of 'us' layout was not displayed by kxkb because its
+'hidden' attribute was wrongly set.
+
+Not submitted upstream to X.Org.
+
+diff -ruN xc-old/programs/xkbcomp/symbols/us xc/programs/xkbcomp/symbols/us
+--- xc-old/programs/xkbcomp/symbols/us	2005-05-08 23:28:59.000000000 -0400
++++ xc/programs/xkbcomp/symbols/us	2005-07-02 16:51:11.000000000 -0400
+@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
+ 
+ // $XFree86: xc/programs/xkbcomp/symbols/us,v 3.14 2003/10/25 13:24:05 pascal Exp $
+ 
+-partial hidden alphanumeric_keys modifier_keys 
++partial alphanumeric_keys modifier_keys 
+ xkb_symbols "basic" {
+ 
+     name[Group1]= "US/ASCII";



Reply to: