On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:15:55PM -0700, Larry Doolittle wrote: > 2. Write a real fix, instead of the stupid s_popen thing. > > I might play around with option 2. There are two strategies > that make technical sense: Why would you do this when there's already a version upstream that fixes this? I don't like the idea of having yet another Xpm 'security fix' variant out there.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature