Bug#305858: xserver-xfree86 leaks client connections
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1
I'm getting client connections refused due to what is claimed to be too many
clients:
$ xlsclients
Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server
Xlib: Maximum number of clients reached
xlsclients: unable to open display ":0.0"
But looking at the /proc/.../fd directory for the X server, I see only a few
dozen connections:
/proc/7032/fd# ls
0 10 12 14 16 18 2 21 26 4 6 8
1 11 13 15 17 19 20 22 3 5 7 9
kegstand:/proc/7032/fd# ls -l
total 24
l-wx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 0 -> /var/log/XFree86.0.log
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 1 -> socket:[5151481]
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 10 -> socket:[5151729]
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 11 -> socket:[5151758]
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 12 -> socket:[6487378]
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 13 -> socket:[5151967]
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 14 -> socket:[5152000]
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 15 -> socket:[5152034]
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 16 -> socket:[5164336]
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 17 -> socket:[5152062]
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 18 -> socket:[5152118]
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 19 -> socket:[5152232]
l-wx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 2 -> /var/log/gdm/:0.log
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 20 -> socket:[5152291]
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 21 -> socket:[5152360]
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 22 -> socket:[7017086]
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 26 -> socket:[5196140]
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 3 -> /dev/tty7
l-wx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 4 -> /proc/mtrr
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 5 -> /dev/dri/card0
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 6 -> /dev/input/mice
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 7 -> socket:[5151557]
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 8 -> socket:[5151562]
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Apr 22 10:40 9 -> socket:[5151672]
--
Brian Ristuccia
brian@ristuccia.com
Reply to: