[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#241008: marked as done (libxft-dev: error during upgrade)



Your message dated Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:42:08 -0500
with message-id <20050402154208.GQ10138@redwald.deadbeast.net>
and subject line closing unfixable bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2004 10:08:03 +0000
>From pot@gnu.org Tue Mar 30 02:08:03 2004
Return-path: <pot@gnu.org>
Received: from pot.isti.cnr.it [146.48.83.182] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1B8GA7-0007nG-00; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 02:08:03 -0800
Received: from pot by pot.isti.cnr.it with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1B8FFM-0005sk-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:09:24 +0200
From: Francesco Potorti` <pot@gnu.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libxft-dev: error during upgrade
X-Debbugs-CC: Francesco Potorti` <pot@softwarelibero.it>
Organization: 
X-fingerprint: 4B2 6187 5C3 D6B1 2E31  7666 9DF 2DC9 BE21 6115
Message-Id: <E1B8FFM-0005sk-00@pot.isti.cnr.it>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:09:24 +0200
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libxft-dev
Version: 2.1.2-5
Severity: normal

Preparing to replace libxft-dev 2.1.2-5 (using .../libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_i386.deb) ...
diversion of /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h to /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h by libxft-dev
Removing `diversion of /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h to /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h by libxft-dev'
dpkg-divert: rename involves overwriting `/usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h' with
  different file `/usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h', not allowed
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_i386.deb (--unpack):
 subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 2
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_i386.deb

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=it_IT@euro (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)

Versions of packages libxft-dev depends on:
ii  libc6-dev [libc-dev]        2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  libfontconfig1-dev          2.2.2-1      generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6-dev            2.1.7-2      FreeType 2 font engine, developmen
ii  libxft2                     2.1.2-6      FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxrender-dev              0.8.3-7      X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  xlibs-dev                   4.3.0-7      X Window System client library dev
ii  zlib1g-dev [libz-dev]       1:1.2.1-5    compression library - development

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 237509-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 15:42:40 +0000
>From branden@redwald.deadbeast.net Sat Apr 02 07:42:40 2005
Return-path: <branden@redwald.deadbeast.net>
Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DHklk-0002N4-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 07:42:40 -0800
Received: from cpe-65-26-182-85.indy.res.rr.com (sisyphus.deadbeast.net) [65.26.182.85] 
	by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DHklj-0007N6-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 08:42:39 -0700
Received: by sisyphus.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 1D8FE68C019; Sat,  2 Apr 2005 10:42:08 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:42:08 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
To: 237509-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing unfixable bug
Message-ID: <20050402154208.GQ10138@redwald.deadbeast.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eLe8FOcWSbbyMVJD"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
Delivered-To: 237509-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--eLe8FOcWSbbyMVJD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This bug is unfixable without an addition to dpkg's feature set, which
wouldn't do any good for xft versions 2.1.2-[12345] anyway, all of which
have long since expired from Debian testing and unstable.

For details on why I can't fix this bug, please see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D237509&msg=3D44

Closing this bug (and the many duplicate reports merged with it).

--=20
G. Branden Robinson                |
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    Yeah, that's what Jesus would do.
branden@debian.org                 |    Jesus would bomb Afghanistan. Yeah.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

--eLe8FOcWSbbyMVJD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkJOvU8ACgkQ6kxmHytGonwVIwCfcFJksR6P9msKp+aYu4l4D+he
BkYAoJR304l4frBxieSHqNRruobX1ycw
=IkK1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--eLe8FOcWSbbyMVJD--



Reply to: