Bug#281203: marked as done (libxft2: SEGV in XftCharIndex() at 'if (!font->hash_value) return 0;')
Your message dated Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:30:27 -0500
with message-id <20050402153027.GO10138@redwald.deadbeast.net>
and subject line closing bug from unresponsive submitter
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Nov 2004 14:28:21 +0000
>From xgl99@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn Sun Nov 14 06:28:21 2004
Return-path: <xgl99@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
Received: from (tu201235.tsinghua.edu.cn) [202.38.103.50]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CTLMb-0004OY-00; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 06:28:21 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
(uid 1000)
by tu201235.tsinghua.edu.cn with local; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 22:43:00 +0800
id 00000130.41976EF4.00002356
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: bear <xgl99@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: SEGV in XftCharIndex at "if (!font->hash_value) return 0"
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 22:42:59 +0800
Message-ID: <courier.41976EF4.00002356@tu201235.tsinghua.edu.cn>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libxft2
Version: 2.1.2-6
Severity: serious
I run a problem which use fltk and SEGV at the beginning of XftCharIndex
The backtrace is like this:
#0 XftCharIndex (dpy=0x81318d0, pub=0x0, ucs4=0) at xftglyphs.c:721
#1 0x41f3d850 in XftDrawString8 (draw=0x8160c38, color=0x81318d0, pub=0x0,
x=135469264, y=135469264, string=0xbffff1e0 "Quit", len=4) at xftdraw.c:527
#2 0x41b023c5 in fl_draw (str=0x81318d0 "x)\025\b\220$\023\b\a", n=135469264,
x=135469264, y=135469264) at fl_font_xft.cxx:255
#3 0x41afec43 in fl_draw (str=0x80e9d14 "Quit", x=570, y=344, w=46, h=21,
align=FL_ALIGN_CENTER,
callthis=0x41b02290 <fl_draw(char const*, int, int, int)>, img=0x0,
draw_symbols=1) at fl_draw.cxx:209
#4 0x41aff289 in fl_draw (str=0x80e9d14 "Quit", x=570, y=344, w=46, h=21,
align=FL_ALIGN_CENTER, img=0x0, draw_symbols=135469264) at fl_draw.cxx:267
#5 0x41b02576 in fl_normal_label (o=0xbffff6c0, X=135469264, Y=135469264,
W=135469264, H=135469264, align=135469264) at fl_labeltype.cxx:44
#6 0x41b02695 in Fl_Label::draw (this=0x0, X=135469264, Y=135469264,
W=135469264, H=135469264, align=135469264) at fl_labeltype.cxx:85
#7 0x41b028cc in Fl_Widget::draw_label (this=0x0, X=135469264, Y=135469264,
W=135469264, H=135469264, a=135469264) at fl_labeltype.cxx:121
#8 0x41b0283b in Fl_Widget::draw_label (this=0x0, X=135469264, Y=135469264,
W=135469264, H=135469264) at Fl_Widget.H:124
#9 0x41b027db in Fl_Widget::draw_label (this=0x8129d98) at Fl_Widget.H:126
#10 0x41ab43e8 in Fl_Button::draw (this=0x8129d98) at Fl_Button.cxx:63
#11 0x41ac54d4 in Fl_Group::draw_child (this=0x8129d10, widget=@0x8129d98)
at Fl_Group.cxx:555
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
#12 0x41ac531b in Fl_Group::draw_children (this=0x8129d10) at Fl_Group.cxx:525
#13 0x41ac53aa in Fl_Group::draw (this=0x8129d10) at Fl_Group.cxx:538
#14 0x41af34c1 in Fl_Window::draw (this=0x8129d10) at Fl_Window.cxx:99
#15 0x41abd01c in Fl_Double_Window::flush (this=0x8129d10, eraseoverlay=0)
at Fl_Double_Window.cxx:310
#16 0x41abcef5 in Fl_Double_Window::flush (this=0x81318d0)
at Fl_Double_Window.cxx:242
#17 0x41aad79f in Fl::flush () at x.H:123
#18 0x41aad3a5 in Fl::wait (time_to_wait=1e+20) at Fl.cxx:287
#19 0x41aad4bb in Fl::run () at Fl.cxx:295
#20 0x08097067 in main ()
is it a bug?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages libxft2 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libfontconfig1 2.2.3-3 generic font configuration library
ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.2 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System client libraries m
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 281203-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 15:30:59 +0000
>From branden@redwald.deadbeast.net Sat Apr 02 07:30:58 2005
Return-path: <branden@redwald.deadbeast.net>
Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DHkaQ-0001nc-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 07:30:58 -0800
Received: from cpe-65-26-182-85.indy.res.rr.com (sisyphus.deadbeast.net) [65.26.182.85]
by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DHkaQ-0000Wj-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 08:30:58 -0700
Received: by sisyphus.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8715968C019; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:30:27 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:30:27 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
To: 281203-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing bug from unresponsive submitter
Message-ID: <20050402153027.GO10138@redwald.deadbeast.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E187YRO8KGM40JwS"
Content-Disposition: inline
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
Delivered-To: 281203-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--E187YRO8KGM40JwS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Aaron Ucko offered advice on 16 November 2004.
I requested more information 7 December 2004.
Bug submitter did not reply to either message.
Closing bug report from unresponsive submitter; before reopening, attempt
to reproduce problem with Xft 2.1.7-1, which was uploaded to unstable
yesterday[1].
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xft.html
--=20
G. Branden Robinson | You are not angry with people when
Debian GNU/Linux | you laugh at them. Humor teaches
branden@debian.org | them tolerance.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- W. Somerset Maugham
--E187YRO8KGM40JwS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkJOupMACgkQ6kxmHytGonxz2gCeMnlZdAqTgeFHO7tHvBYS2S5k
1aIAnA/pPqhfELVd78nHbq2wXeYTRwct
=boAo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--E187YRO8KGM40JwS--
Reply to: