[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFC: stable update for XFree86



On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 01:40:59PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [I am not subscribed to debian-user; please be sure the debian-x mailing
> list is included in your follow-ups if you want me to see them.  Please
> also do not keep Joey in your To/CC headers unless you really want to
> communicate privately with him.]
> 
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 12:47:58PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > 
> > It's your friendly neighborhood X Strike Force lunatic with a request for
> > some feedback from woody users.
> [...]
> > I'd like to open a comment/discussion period lasting a couple of weeks.  I
> > may close it early if there is insufficient interest, or under extenuating
> > circumstances (e.g., Joey tells me none of the above changes is permissible
> > under any circumstance).
> 
> I am closing this comment period after 6 days due to phenomenal levels of
> disinterest (zero replies!).  I'm not sure if that's a good thing or a bad
> thing -- do people simply trust me, or does no one care?  :)
> 
> In any case, Joey and I have been in private contact, and, barring odd
> problems, you can expect all of the bugfixes mentioned in my previous
> message[1] to appear in xfree86 4.1.0-16woody6.

Sorry. I should probably have been more verbose. :)

I don't have the context to be certain about all of them, but nothing there
strikes me as being tremendously insane, even for a stable release update,
so if you and the SRM both think it's a good list, I have no argument with
it.
-- 
Joel Aelwyn <fenton@debian.org>                                       ,''`.
                                                                     : :' :
                                                                     `. `'
                                                                       `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: