On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 05:16:59PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 12:12:51AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:05:58AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > BTW, what is the status of the mesa package ? Frank asked me to go ahead with > > > the NMU i proposed to do, to fix the FTBFS problem, but i heard someone is > > > working on mesa 6.4 packages. > > > > I'm currently working on Mesa 6.4 packages. Haven't had much time this > > week (in Canada), but if you absolutely need them than I guess I can > > finish it off. > > Well, the question is if it is worth it to NMU the current mesa packages which > FTBFS, or if the 6.4 packages are imminent and fix the issues. If you want to NMU to fix it, feel free. The 6.4 packages reorganise a couple of things, so I really want to talk to Marcelo about them.
Description: Digital signature