Bug#333121: marked as done (xdm: cannot be installed on Debian unstable)
Your message dated Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:58:48 +0200
with message-id <200510101658.49385.ender@debian.org>
and subject line Bug#333121: xdm: cannot be installed on Debian unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2005 14:11:29 +0000
>From danielemc@gmail.com Mon Oct 10 07:11:29 2005
Return-path: <danielemc@gmail.com>
Received: from angola.emc.ufsc.br (localhost.localdomain) [150.162.100.53]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EOyNE-0002jv-00; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 07:11:29 -0700
Received: from daniel by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EOyN7-0002is-Ml; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 11:11:21 -0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: daniel <danielemc@gmail.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: xdm: cannot be installed on Debian unstable
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 11:11:21 -0300
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1EOyN7-0002is-Ml@localhost.localdomain>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: xdm
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
xdm depends on xbase-clients which will not be installed
xbase-clients depends on xlibs which will not be installed
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 333121-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2005 14:58:52 +0000
>From ender@debian.org Mon Oct 10 07:58:52 2005
Return-path: <ender@debian.org>
Received: from cerrojo.elmundo.es (mail2.elmundo.es) [193.110.128.12]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EOz75-0007Se-00; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 07:58:52 -0700
Received: from xanes.el-mundo.int (xanes.elmundo.int [10.5.222.50])
by mail2.elmundo.es (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 78DD7460D3; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:58:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix, from userid 65500)
id 5434D17315; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:58:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ip6-localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 2ACAB17313; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:58:50 +0200 (CEST)
From: David =?iso-8859-1?q?Mart=EDnez_Moreno?= <ender@debian.org>
Organization: Debian
To: daniel <danielemc@gmail.com>, 333121-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#333121: xdm: cannot be installed on Debian unstable
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:58:48 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
References: <[🔎] E1EOyN7-0002is-Ml@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E1EOyN7-0002is-Ml@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart3148502.A73ue1nsP8";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200510101658.49385.ender@debian.org>
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.413380, version=0.10.3
Delivered-To: 333121-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--nextPart3148502.A73ue1nsP8
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
El Lunes, 10 de Octubre de 2005 16:11, daniel escribi=F3:
> Package: xdm
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> xdm depends on xbase-clients which will not be installed
>
> xbase-clients depends on xlibs which will not be installed
Your bug report is invalid. Apart that it misses valuable information abou=
t=20
your problem, it works for me:
ender@polgara:~$ LC_ALL=3DC sudo apt-get install xdm
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
xdm
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/329kB of archives.
After unpacking 983kB of additional disk space will be used.
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
Retrieving bug reports... Done
Preconfiguring packages ...
Selecting previously deselected package xdm.
(Reading database ... 98584 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking xdm (from .../xdm_6.8.2.dfsg.1-8_i386.deb) ...
Setting up xdm (6.8.2.dfsg.1-8) ...
Adding system startup for /etc/init.d/xdm ...
/etc/rc0.d/K01xdm -> ../init.d/xdm
/etc/rc1.d/K01xdm -> ../init.d/xdm
/etc/rc6.d/K01xdm -> ../init.d/xdm
/etc/rc2.d/S99xdm -> ../init.d/xdm
/etc/rc3.d/S99xdm -> ../init.d/xdm
/etc/rc4.d/S99xdm -> ../init.d/xdm
/etc/rc5.d/S99xdm -> ../init.d/xdm
If you keep having problems, please send us the full apt-get/dpkg session,=
=20
along with the output of "dpkg -l|grep dfsg".
I am closing this bug report. If you feel that this is invalid, please reo=
pen=20
(i.e. reply to my mail).
Thank you,
Ender.
=2D-
To the infinity, and beyond!
-- Buzz Lightyear (Toy Story).
=2D-
=C1rea de Internet - Network services
Mundinteractivos - El Mundo
C/Pradillo, 42 - Madrid (Spain)
--nextPart3148502.A73ue1nsP8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDSoGpWs/EhA1iABsRAipLAJ4uDsVJko7ywghNxKaVPAjBCGBL+wCg5FRm
zIJrpihj4bt8YCHDkKMbGi8=
=a/O/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart3148502.A73ue1nsP8--
Reply to: