Bug#296592: marked as done (dimensions of icons with icon border are calculated wrong)
Your message dated Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:01:24 +0200
with message-id <[🔎] 200508021001.31879.ender@debian.org>
and subject line Bug#296592: #296592 dimensions of icons with icon border are calculated wrong
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Feb 2005 14:06:20 +0000
>From bernhard.sammer@arz.co.at Wed Feb 23 06:06:20 2005
Return-path: <bernhard.sammer@arz.co.at>
Received: from msi2.arz.co.at [193.110.182.34]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D3x9f-0007sO-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 06:06:20 -0800
Received: from 10.1.19.31(c860031f.m286) by msi2.arz.co.at via phion mailgw
id 20050223-140542-02599-00; Wed Feb 23 14:05:42 2005
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sensitivity:
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.1 January 21, 2004
Message-ID: <OF70B0A78D.74F94649-ONC1256FB1.0045F640-41256FB1.004D6CA9@arz.co.at>
From: bernhard.sammer@arz.co.at
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:05:40 +0100
Subject: dimensions of icons with icon border are calculated wrong
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on LN000P50/SRV/ARZ-Com/AT(Release 6.0.3|September 26, 2003) at
23.02.2005 15:05:42,
Serialize complete at 23.02.2005 15:05:42
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 004D6CA341256FB1_="
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE,
HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 004D6CA341256FB1_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: xterm(200) 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
To see the problem, set something like the following X resources:
XTerm.vt100.activeIcon: true
XTerm.vt100.iconBorderColor: sandy brown
XTerm.vt100.iconBorderWidth: >0
If you resize a newly created xterm window and then iconify it the=20
dimensions (size and relative position) of the icon and icon title are=20
calculated wrong. It seems that the width of the border is not included in =
the calculation. The icon slightly overlaps the the icon title.
This causes an endless loop of redraws of the icon title and the icon! The =
xterm icon does not respond and the overlapping region begins to blink=20
each second. In some rare cases this also caused fvwm to crash in my=20
installation.
Important: you need a window manager that supports active icons and icon=20
borders. I used fvwm.
There is also an error in the xterm manual page: the manual page says that =
the default of XTerm.vt100.iconBorderWidth is 0, but at least under Debian =
Linux this is not true, You must explicitly set it to 0 to have no border=20
(if you have no icon border the problem described above does not happen).
----------------
Disclaimer:
Diese Nachricht dient ausschlie=DFlich zu Informationszwecken und ist nur=20
f=FCr den Gebrauch des Empf=E4ngers bestimmt.
This message is only for informational purposes and is intended solely for =
the use of the addressee.
----------------=20
--=_alternative 004D6CA341256FB1_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<br><font size=3D2><tt>Package: xterm(200) 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10<br>
<br>
To see the problem, set something like the following X resources:</tt></fon=
t>
<br>
<br><font size=3D2><tt>XTerm.vt100.activeIcon: true<br>
XTerm.vt100.iconBorderColor: sandy brown<br>
XTerm.vt100.iconBorderWidth: >0<br>
</tt></font>
<br><font size=3D2><tt>If you resize a newly created xterm window and then
iconify it the dimensions (size and relative position) of the icon and
icon title are calculated wrong. It seems that the width of the border
is not included in the calculation. The icon slightly overlaps the the
icon title.</tt></font>
<br>
<br><font size=3D2><tt>This causes an endless loop of redraws of the icon
title and the icon! The xterm icon does not respond and the overlapping
region begins to blink each second. In some rare cases this also caused
fvwm to crash in my installation.</tt></font>
<br>
<br><font size=3D2><tt>Important: you need a window manager that supports
active icons and icon borders. I used fvwm.</tt></font>
<br>
<br><font size=3D2><tt>There is also an error in the xterm manual page: the
manual page says that the default of XTerm.vt100.iconBorderWidth is 0,
but at least under Debian Linux this is not true, You must explicitly set
it to 0 to have no border (if you have no icon border the problem described
above does not happen).</tt></font>
<br><font size=3D2><tt><br>
<br>
</tt></font><font size=3D2 face=3D"Arial">----------------<br>
Disclaimer:<br>
Diese Nachricht dient ausschlie=DFlich zu Informationszwecken und ist nur
f=FCr den Gebrauch des Empf=E4ngers bestimmt.<br>
<br>
This message is only for informational purposes and is intended solely
for the use of the addressee.<br>
---------------- </font>
--=_alternative 004D6CA341256FB1_=--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 296592-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2005 08:01:36 +0000
>From ender@debian.org Tue Aug 02 01:01:36 2005
Return-path: <ender@debian.org>
Received: from cerrojo.elmundo.es (mail2.elmundo.es) [193.110.128.12]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DzriR-0007oq-00; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 01:01:36 -0700
Received: from xanes.el-mundo.int (xanes.elmundo.int [10.5.222.50])
by mail2.elmundo.es (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 8969B4612E; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:01:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix, from userid 65500)
id A0FFC17315; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:01:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from polgara.elmundo.int (polgara.elmundo.int [10.5.222.135])
by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 7895417313; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:01:33 +0200 (CEST)
From: David =?iso-8859-15?q?Mart=EDnez_Moreno?= <ender@debian.org>
Organization: Debian
To: debian-x@lists.debian.org, 296592-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#296592: #296592 dimensions of icons with icon border are calculated wrong
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:01:24 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1
References: <[🔎] 20050802002928.GA32264@invisible-island.net>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20050802002928.GA32264@invisible-island.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart20056119.6KfQZUEz1T";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[🔎] 200508021001.31879.ender@debian.org>
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.447329, version=0.10.3
Delivered-To: 296592-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--nextPart20056119.6KfQZUEz1T
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-1
El Martes, 2 de Agosto de 2005 02:29, Thomas Dickey escribi=F3:
> this is fixed in patch #201
Hello, Bernhard. This bug is fixed in xterm 6.8.2.dfsg.1-1 and later.
Thank you for your bug report,
Ender.
=2D-=20
Mr. Anderson! Welcome back, we missed you.
-- Agent Smith (Matrix Revolutions).
=2D-
Debian developer
--nextPart20056119.6KfQZUEz1T
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBC7yhbWs/EhA1iABsRAv94AKCwhudobrK9IDKcwdCPYY1aks90hACgoUMP
56Px4xJS7wMPGC24Dg5Vna4=
=47n3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart20056119.6KfQZUEz1T--
Reply to: