Hello, Mike. I have read all the (in)famous bug Redhat#161242, regarding libvgahw.a. It seems that you rolled out a -43 release that intends to fix this problem. As far as I can tell, gcc developers have not agreed about the path for fixing this issue. My question is: what have you done for #161242 in that latest release? Maybe apply the patch that Olivier Baudron posted in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=161242#c63, or simply compile without optimization libvgahw.a, or a third solution? Given that you seem to be responsible for this last release, I prefer to ask you, and avoid reading all the patches in -43 if possible. ;-) Thank you in advance, Ender. -- Why is a cow? Mu. (Ommmmmmmmmm) -- Debian developer
Attachment:
pgpHMCdUIg16q.pgp
Description: PGP signature