[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

X Strike Force Xft SVN commit: r116 - in trunk: . debian



Author: branden
Date: 2005-03-31 15:47:14 -0500 (Thu, 31 Mar 2005)
New Revision: 116

Modified:
   trunk/debian/changelog
   trunk/xft-config.in
Log:
Enhance xft-config's usage message:
+ Use ellipsis notation to indicate that more than one option is allowed.
+ Provide one-sentence summary of the command's purpose.
+ Sort option names in lexicographic order.


Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/changelog	2005-03-31 20:37:22 UTC (rev 115)
+++ trunk/debian/changelog	2005-03-31 20:47:14 UTC (rev 116)
@@ -6,11 +6,14 @@
     Keith Packard as the upstream maintainer, not the upstream author
     (upstream now provides an AUTHORS file to clarify the latter).
 
-  * Correct xft-config's usage message:
+  * Correct and enhance xft-config's usage message:
     + No non-option arguments are allowed.
     + At least one option argument must be specified.
+    + Use ellipsis notation to indicate that more than one option is allowed.
+    + Provide one-sentence summary of the command's purpose.
+    + Sort option names in lexicographic order.
 
- -- Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>  Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:36:12 -0500
+ -- Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>  Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:46:45 -0500
 
 xft (2.1.2-6) unstable; urgency=low
 

Modified: trunk/xft-config.in
===================================================================
--- trunk/xft-config.in	2005-03-31 20:37:22 UTC (rev 115)
+++ trunk/xft-config.in	2005-03-31 20:47:14 UTC (rev 116)
@@ -15,13 +15,15 @@
 usage()
 {
   cat <<EOF
-Usage: xft-config [OPTIONS]
+Usage: xft-config [OPTION] ...
+Report Xft library compiler flags, linker flags, and/or version.
+
 Options:
+ [--cflags]
+ [--exec-prefix[=DIR]]
+ [--libs]
  [--prefix[=DIR]]
- [--exec-prefix[=DIR]]
  [--version]
- [--libs]
- [--cflags]
 At least one option must be specified.
 EOF
   exit $1



Reply to: