X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r14 - trunk/debian
Author: branden
Date: 2005-03-05 21:09:44 -0500 (Sat, 05 Mar 2005)
New Revision: 14
Modified:
trunk/debian/control
Log:
Remove build-dependency on m4. It was used only to create a control file
for the long-defunct xlibmesa-drm-source package.
Modified: trunk/debian/control
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/control 2005-03-06 02:01:53 UTC (rev 13)
+++ trunk/debian/control 2005-03-06 02:09:44 UTC (rev 14)
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force <debian-x@lists.debian.org>
Uploaders: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>, Fabio M. Di Nitto <fabbione@fabbione.net>
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
-Build-Depends: dpkg-dev (>= 1.10.14), flex, bison, bsdmainutils, groff, zlib1g-dev | libz-dev, libncurses5-dev | libncurses-dev, libpam0g-dev | libpam-dev, libfreetype6-dev, libpaperg, tetex-bin, po-debconf, debhelper (>= 4.1.16), lynx, libglide2-dev (>> 2001.01.26) [i386], libglide3-dev (>= 2002.04.10-7) [alpha amd64 i386 ia64], linux-kernel-headers, libpng12-dev | libpng-dev, libexpat1-dev, libfontconfig1-dev, fontconfig, bzip2, libxft-dev (>= 2.1.2), libxrender-dev (>= 0.8.3), libxcursor-dev, dbs, m4
+Build-Depends: dpkg-dev (>= 1.10.14), flex, bison, bsdmainutils, groff, zlib1g-dev | libz-dev, libncurses5-dev | libncurses-dev, libpam0g-dev | libpam-dev, libfreetype6-dev, libpaperg, tetex-bin, po-debconf, debhelper (>= 4.1.16), lynx, libglide2-dev (>> 2001.01.26) [i386], libglide3-dev (>= 2002.04.10-7) [alpha amd64 i386 ia64], linux-kernel-headers, libpng12-dev | libpng-dev, libexpat1-dev, libfontconfig1-dev, fontconfig, bzip2, libxft-dev (>= 2.1.2), libxrender-dev (>= 0.8.3), libxcursor-dev, dbs
Build-Conflicts: cpp-3.3 (<< 1:3.3.3-0pre1), linux-kernel-headers (<< 2.5.999-test7-bk-15) [sparc]
# Reasons for Build-Depends:
@@ -47,7 +47,6 @@
# libxrender-dev (>= 0.8.3)
# libxcursor-dev
# dbs
-# m4
# Reasons for Build-Conflicts:
# cpp-3.3 (<< 1:3.3.3-0pre1) previous versions of cpp 3.3 had broken
# support for the -traditional flag
Reply to: