X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r2127 - in trunk/debian: . local
Author: branden
Date: 2005-01-10 15:33:51 -0500 (Mon, 10 Jan 2005)
New Revision: 2127
Modified:
trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml
Log:
[cosmetic] Fix typo. Thanks to Aaron Ucko for catching it.
Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/CHANGESETS 2005-01-10 20:28:25 UTC (rev 2126)
+++ trunk/debian/CHANGESETS 2005-01-10 20:33:51 UTC (rev 2127)
@@ -8,6 +8,9 @@
(It should always be safe to merge the latest version of TODO or CHANGESETS
files anywhere.)
+Miscellaneous cosmetic fixes.
+ 2126
+
The loading of srvr_ctrl(xfree86) symbol definitions for Sun keyboards
was broken and made such keyboards unusable. (Closes: #286268)
2079, 2085
Modified: trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml 2005-01-10 20:28:25 UTC (rev 2126)
+++ trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml 2005-01-10 20:33:51 UTC (rev 2127)
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@
XFree86 codebase.) While this development was lauded by many redistributors and
feature-hungry end users, its short-term practical impact was fairly small. OS
distributors stuck with XFree86 because it was familiar and functional.
-Futhermore, the continued use of the MIT/X11 license terms ensured that
+Furthermore, the continued use of the MIT/X11 license terms ensured that
cross-pollination between the projects would work to everyone's benefit. The
redistributors, and thus most end users, were expected to continue using
XFree86, at the very least until one of the forks had a replacement finished.
Reply to: