[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r2124 - in trunk/debian: . patches



Author: branden
Date: 2005-01-10 14:32:04 -0500 (Mon, 10 Jan 2005)
New Revision: 2124

Modified:
   trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
   trunk/debian/changelog
   trunk/debian/patches/099m_mga_increase_minimum_pixel_clock.diff
Log:
Permit lower pixel clocks (less than 17.75 MHz, but greater than 12 MHz)
on older (Millenium, Mystique) Matrox cards.  Thanks to Jan Gorski for
supplying information (updates fix for #261993).


Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/CHANGESETS	2005-01-10 18:17:24 UTC (rev 2123)
+++ trunk/debian/CHANGESETS	2005-01-10 19:32:04 UTC (rev 2124)
@@ -114,4 +114,9 @@
 (Closes: #289508)
     2123
 
+Permit lower pixel clocks (less than 17.75 MHz, but greater than 12 MHz)
+on older (Millenium, Mystique) Matrox cards.  Thanks to Jan Gorski for
+supplying information (updates fix for #261993).
+    2124
+
 vim:set ai et sts=4 sw=4 tw=80:

Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/changelog	2005-01-10 18:17:24 UTC (rev 2123)
+++ trunk/debian/changelog	2005-01-10 19:32:04 UTC (rev 2124)
@@ -93,8 +93,12 @@
   * Fix typo in German debconf template translations.  Thanks, Georg Neis!
     (Closes: #289508)
 
- -- Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>  Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:16:05 -0500
+  * Permit lower pixel clocks (less than 17.75 MHz, but greater than 12 MHz)
+    on older (Millenium, Mystique) Matrox cards.  Thanks to Jan Gorski for
+    supplying information (updates fix for #261993).
 
+ -- Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>  Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:29:58 -0500
+
 xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-10) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Upload urgency set to medium due to fix for stable-release-critical bugs

Modified: trunk/debian/patches/099m_mga_increase_minimum_pixel_clock.diff
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/patches/099m_mga_increase_minimum_pixel_clock.diff	2005-01-10 18:17:24 UTC (rev 2123)
+++ trunk/debian/patches/099m_mga_increase_minimum_pixel_clock.diff	2005-01-10 19:32:04 UTC (rev 2124)
@@ -1,28 +1,59 @@
 $Id$
 
-Increase the minimum pixel clock for Matrox cards based on feedback from
-Teemu Ikonen.  See <URL:
-http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=261993 >.
+Set the minimum pixel clock for Matrox cards based on the chipset.
 
+Thanks to Teemu Ikonen for G550 information, Jeff King for G400
+information, and Jan Gorski for Mystique information.
+
+See <URL: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=261993 >.
+
 This patch by Branden Robinson.
 
-Not submitted upstream to XFree86.
+Not submitted upstream to XFree86 or X.Org.
 
---- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/mga/mga_driver.c~	2004-12-09 13:01:06.000000000 -0500
-+++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/mga/mga_driver.c	2004-12-09 13:03:50.000000000 -0500
-@@ -1987,8 +1987,13 @@
+--- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/mga/mga_driver.c~	2005-01-10 13:49:11.000000000 -0500
++++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/mga/mga_driver.c	2005-01-10 14:07:51.000000000 -0500
+@@ -1987,10 +1987,39 @@
  
      /* XXX Set HW cursor use */
  
 -    /* Set the min pixel clock */
 -    pMga->MinClock = 12000;	/* XXX Guess, need to check this */
+-    xf86DrvMsg(pScrn->scrnIndex, X_DEFAULT, "Min pixel clock is %d MHz\n",
+-	       pMga->MinClock / 1000);
 +    /*
-+     * Set the min pixel clock; this was originally guessed to be 12000,
-+     * but an MGA G550 user reports that modes with clocks less than 17750
-+     * lock up the card.  See
++     * Set the minimum pixel clock; this was originally guessed to be 12000
++     * (kHz).  MGA G550 and G400 users report that modes with clocks less
++     * than 17750 lock up the card.  A Mystique user reports that a 12.6
++     * MHz pixel clock works fine.  See
 +     * <URL: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=261993 >
++     * for details.
++     *
++     * Based on the above, I am assuming that Millenium- and Mystique-era
++     * cards can handle the lower clocks, and the G-series cards cannot.
++     * Unrecognized chips are presumed below to be of the newer variety,
++     * which don't support the low pixel clocks.
++     * -- Branden Robinson
 +     */
-+    pMga->MinClock = 17750;
-     xf86DrvMsg(pScrn->scrnIndex, X_DEFAULT, "Min pixel clock is %d MHz\n",
- 	       pMga->MinClock / 1000);
++    switch(pMga->Chipset) {
++	case PCI_CHIP_MGA2064:
++	case PCI_CHIP_MGA1064:
++	case PCI_CHIP_MGA2164:
++	case PCI_CHIP_MGA2164_AGP:
++	    pMga->MinClock = 12000;
++	    break;
++	case PCI_CHIP_MGAG100:
++	case PCI_CHIP_MGAG100_PCI:
++	case PCI_CHIP_MGAG200:
++	case PCI_CHIP_MGAG200_PCI:
++	case PCI_CHIP_MGAG400:
++	case PCI_CHIP_MGAG550:
++	default:
++	    pMga->MinClock = 17750;
++	    break;
++    }
++    xf86DrvMsg(pScrn->scrnIndex, X_DEFAULT, "Minimum permitted pixel clock is "
++	       " %d MHz\n", pMga->MinClock / 1000);
      /*
+      * If the user has specified ramdac speed in the XF86Config
+      * file, we respect that setting.



Reply to: